Paul Clement

Probably biased because his overall client base is so wrong-minded, but his advocacy in front of the Supreme Court is hard for me to take. Guy surely is a genius, blah blah, but even in a case I'm fairly neutral about (Aereo), he comes off as grating -- has a "my side is obviously right, the other (disdain)" tone that really turns me off. And, more than once (other days), his arguments came off as shoddy. There are ways to be wrong and not be so hard to take.