There was some consistency in the early 20th Century cases where federal power was at times interpreted too narrowly (e.g., the
Child Labor Cases) -- it took a while for the war on drugs to be readily accepted. Even Holmes
in 1916 stated a federal ban as constitutionally dubious. As seen
here, nice and bluntly, some retained doubt into the 1920s. McReynolds might have been an ass, but he had his moments.
U.S. v. Miller was pretty well written too.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thanks for your .02!