According to CJ Rehnquist's opinion in the Pledge Case, President Washington said: "Whereas it is the duty of all Nations to acknowledge the problems of Almighty God, to obey His will, to be grateful for his benefits, and humbly to implore his protection and favor. . . ." I think that works pretty well in a way, though "problems" apparently should be "providence." Anyway, fret not -- spell check problems exist at the highest levels.
Michael Newdow himself has an interesting, and admirably above the fray, article on the rights of parents in family courts in Slate. His milking the cow example suggests the problem -- many feel he is looking at things too impersonally, putting his rights over his child. I comment on this concern here; see also here.
Overall, I remained throughout respectful of those worried about the little girl in this case, but could not deny he as a father had an important interest as well. And lest we forget, the right exists in part because the connection he has to the child is important for her interests as well. Criticize him, in some way you criticize a part of the child as well.