Performing arts is more than just sound. They reflect who we are as Americans. And as human beings. That's especially true for more than 200 Kennedy Center Honorees over the past 46 years for helps shape, how we see ourselves, how we see each other, and how we see our world honors not just based on the length of the career, the scope of the work of heightened fame, but because of their unique place in the conscience, and the very soul of our dynamic and diverse nation."
Very soul. And, Trump leads it now. Oh very.
It makes some sense for the president to serve as an honorary leader of a national cultural center. So, for instance, you see the king in a Hallmark Channel movie involved in culture. First ladies, current and former, are honorary members of the Kennedy Center.
Still, we do generally leave it to others. Will it now be a thing for presidents (or whatever Trump is)? On some level, I don't think that is inherently a bad thing. It is just that some people aren't fit for the job.
Trump definitely included. Ugh.
Also, there is an overall concern. A political governmental actor directly heading the Kennedy Center makes it more likely to be politicized. First Amendment problems can arise.
Trump is especially problematic here but there is some value to have some separation of arts and states. It won't totally be so. The government will fund the arts somehow, even if it is just in public schools.
Nonetheless, the president (and whatever Trump is*) heading the Kennedy Center for Performing Arts can be problematic. Again, the problem here is particularly Trump, who not only took the unprecedented move of replacing the whole board but stepping in as chair.
The presidential appointments will obviously have some influence. We have here yet another reason why it is so important to choose wisely at election time.
[Chris Geidner said he will write a substack about the Kennedy stuff. His will be better. This is my .02.]
===
* I continue to refuse to call Trump the "p" word because I believe it requires a bare minimum of respect for the office that he lacks.
People continue to say that "the left" or whatever has opposed all Republicans. This is not true. I was quite upset when President Bush was in power earlier in this century. I did not mind calling him "President" Bush.
People who have some responsibility to call him his official title can do so. I think his supporters get some form of sexual pleasure from doing so. I won't.
Some will say it is a fait accompli and that it should be used to underline the state we are in. That has some validity. I still will not use the title any more than a local community who knows a priest is a molester need not call the person "Father" Brown.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thanks for your .02!