Beauty and The Beast

I sometimes watch DVDs with someone who has not watched many of the films that many have seen. I recently re-watched Enchanted with her. Last night was B&B. The animated version. 

(Years later, we had the live-action version. Kevin Kline played the grandfather.) 

Multiple familiar actors do the voices, including the person who later played the gruff police officer Lenny on Law & Order, though some might remember him from Dirty Dancing. 

[Jerry Orbach had done some stage work.*]

The film has some good songs. It also has scary parts, including when wolves threaten Belle.

The "heavy" is also a rather cruel character. His flunky reminds somewhat of the flunky in Enchanted.

His being a sexist boor is one thing. Then, he goes next level. Again, I can see some parents being like the mother of "Chip," and thinking their children were too young for some of this.

True enough, the original fairy tales were rather dark. But we generally have a sanitized version. Up to a point. Not quite as dark as this.

One thing that is somewhat lost is that this is supposed to be taking place in France. A few of the servants are French, but Belle and many of the others do not sound very French.

I guess the original edit was deemed inappropriate. 

The film is about true love conquering all -- both familial (Belle sacrifices herself for her father) and romantic (a beauty falls for a beast). Also, about the dangers of appearances. Dreaming of more. 

And, of course, the power of reading.

The true symbol that all is well is when they kiss. For the value of a true love kiss, see either Enchanted or a Hallmark Channel film. A kiss is a standard finale. 

==

* Jerry Orbach, to be clear, did a significant amount of stage work. Many people only know him as "Lenny." 

His first appearance on the show -- the actor -- was a one-episode guest role portraying someone else. If footnotes are not the place for trivia, what is? 

Other Films 

To toss it in there, since the film is so popular, they decided to do some spin-offs. Oh, you mean after the events of the film? No silly. 

People like the enchanted castle stuff. So, looking at the plot summaries, the stories generally involve stuff that would have taken place during the film. 

It might not be completely clear (it wasn't for me), but the "time skip" entry here suggests the film takes place over an extended period. So, there is plenty of time for additional "enchanted" content. 

As to the live-action film, there was also one back in the day. Tubi shows me there are multiple live-action versions without all the enchanted details. 

I once started watching the live-action version of the animated film that this entry discusses. It didn't really, including the lead, catch my interest. 

It also tosses in various extra details, which aren't really necessary and might be counterproductive. Still, I think I will try to watch it again. 

Jessica Kellgren-Fozard

 

JKF's video came into my YouTube feed. 

She has some interesting content, especially related to LGBTQ and disability issues. She is a lesbian mother and with various disabilities. She has a quirky voice though you can tell here (when she is tired) it is somewhat an affect. 

We can be overwhelmed with all of this content. But it also is amazing, huh? Should I check up more on stuff that would turn me off? Probably. You know, watch a bit of Fox News or a dubious podcaster. OTOH, there is so much other stuff. Oh well. 

Quickies

I re-read The Sunflower Forest. I wrote a review. Overall, I enjoyed it. Not sure about the triple murder.

Roberts handed down an administrative stay in the Trump Ballroom Case. Such stays often are only temporary. The litigation has been going on for a while as illegal construction occurs. Congress has the best ability to address this. But Trump Republicans control. 

The Mets are playing well. Oh well. Credible shot at .500 or close. 

Florida Executes William Frances Silvia

He murdered his wife about twenty years ago and seriously hurt his mother-in-law. 

The jury later decided it warranted a death sentence, 11-1. His lawyers tried to challenge the unanimous jury finding, but a court held that he waived the challenge.

It does sound like he had mental health issues:

In 1999, Silvia's mother was killed by a drunken driver, and two years later, his brother John died from a drug overdose. According to defense psychologist Deborah Day, Silvia has a history of mental illness in the family, with his sister suffering from bipolar disorder and having been committed multiple times. Silvia himself attended sessions with a psychiatrist during his first marriage and was put on medications for six months.

The final appeal flagged that Silvia, in the end, had to rely on a lawyer also defending another person recently executed. This allegedly resulted in inadequate representation.

The Supreme Court, as usual, rejected this final appeal (this morning) without comment. These last-minute appeals are often somewhat desperate. This one isn't much different.

I still would have liked at least some justice to discuss the matter since we are talking about a final appeal, the end result being the deprivation of life. Oh well.

This is another case where people won't cry much for the person executed. It also does not appear to be a "worst of the worst" case. 

He viciously murdered his spouse. There is a lot of domestic violence, often by people with a lot of issues. This was murderous. Warrants a long prison sentence. Instead, he lost the execution lottery. 

Florida has been the busiest again, executing 13 of the 23 people executed this year. Texas had four and still has multiple scheduled for later this year. Oklahoma had three. Three states had one each. This is partially a game of catch-up. But still. 

SCOTUS Reminds Us To Be Ashamed (Yes, About Trump)

The second (of three) scheduled Supreme Court summer order list was released today. 

The usual housekeeping dominated the short list of orders. Alito didn't take part in one case. The usual "rehearings denied" (they are nearly never granted) were included. 

The list started this way:

REHEARINGS DENIED

25-432 PUCKETT, CARL E., ET UX. V. AIN JEEM, INC., ET AL.

25-567 VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC. V. FCC, ET AL.

25-573 TRUMP, DONALD J. V. CARROLL, E. JEAN

As noted by my local paper:

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court on Monday again rebuffed President Donald Trump’s push to throw out a jury’s $5 million finding that he sexually abused the writer E. Jean Carroll at a New York City department store in the mid-1990s and later defamed her.

Many people alleged* that Trump, in various respects, sexually assaulted women. Trump has been accused of trying to see teen beauty contestants in a state of undress. He bragged about being able to do these things with impunity.  

The "grab the pussy" talk received some attention. We know how things have gone. See also, Thomas and Kavanaugh.

E.J.  Carroll, taking advantage of a New York law that extended the window, was able to obtain a jury verdict that Trump sexually assaulted her. 

He denied it. Toss in defamation. He kept it up after the civil judgment. Another jury found defamation again. This time with a much higher financial judgment. The appeal for that is still pending. 

People, if they are halfway honest, don't have the vapors about either charge. Defamation? 

To slightly paraphrase a Supreme Court opinion, "Lying was and still is his habit." 

The denial of rehearing is not truly news. There was no real chance that it would be granted. 

(Trump already gave her the money, but it was held in trust until the finalization of the appeal.) 

What it does help remind us is the nature of the person in the Oval Office. The election of Trump will be a blot on our country for time immemorial. 

Sexual wrongdoing has been a major concern in multiple political races this election cycle. The Democratic candidate for governor in California and for Senate in Maine are different than expected for that reason. OTOH, we have Max Miller. 

Trump remains a symbol of what not to do. 

===

* One woman, someone who would otherwise be a Trump supporter, particularly comes to mind.

She alleged wrongdoing. Trump defamed her. She sued. The litigation went on and on and on.

She finally gave up. It wasn't worth the hassle, including not being able to openly talk about it. The Trump side alleged total vindication. 

Reasonable Doubts

 

I saw Stripped to Kill on YouTube. Kay Lenz co-starred, making me think of her role in this television show, which I watched when it was first on. A few episodes, at least, are also on YouTube. 

Stripped to Kill is enjoyable "B" film fare, though the plot gets a bit too silly. The ending, for instance, is too drawn out. The first episode of Reasonable Doubts brings an overdone plot device or two (crooked cops, huh?). But I found the show overall comfort food television. 

August Executions

Three executions in three states. None in Florida or Texas.

Anthony Darrell Dugard Hines (TN)

These lengthy delays create two special constitutional difficulties. First, a lengthy delay in and of itself is especially cruel because it “subjects death row inmates to decades of especially severe, dehumanizing conditions of confinement.” Second, a lengthy delay undermines the death penalty’s penological rationale.

Hines was sentenced to die for a rape/murder committed forty years ago. I hold to my repeated concern, with the usual Breyer reference, about these delays. Sotomayor and/or Jackson should support it. 

Various reasons to suggest he is guilty, but he claims innocence. The final Supreme Court appeal cites red flags as to state execution procedures, including not supplying enough details about them. 

The Court, per curiam (Sotomayor dissented), earlier overturned a lower court holding of ineffective counsel. This time, as usual, they rejected the final appeal without comment. 

The execution occurred later that morning. 

Carlos Cuesta-Rodriguez (OK) 

Rodriguez opposed commutation of his death sentence from over twenty years ago for murdering his girlfriend (common law wife). He's 70. The execution is a semi-voluntary euthanasia move. 

The main argument against execution is that there are possible mitigating factors, including acceptance of his guilt. Another "lottery" pick for execution. 

Jeremy Williams (AL) 

Williams admitted guilt of a truly horrible crime: the rape and murder of a young child. He waived appeals. 

Remarkably, the crime took place less than five years ago. I complained about delays. So, yes, that is good on some level. There was some time to ensure the execution is appropriate, even if he accepts it.

(If you want to click, you can see the details of the crime. I'm not avoiding them. I accept hard cases. The details are horrible, especially who helped him.) 

His remorse is a reason not to execute him. Alabama also has had multiple problems with execution procedures. That is a problem, even if the person is crystal clear guilty and worthy of death.

Williams was the last of the three to be executed. Alabama used lethal injection; nitrogen gas was blocked in an earlier case in court. 

===

Another execution is scheduled next week.

We also have a schedule of the current November oral arguments. For completeness, let's toss in that Kagan provided a one-day administrative stay here.