He had his moments. He was lately a tired, pathetic Trump supporter. More here with an extended bit on Mitch McConnell.
Joe's Eclectic Thoughts
Various thoughts on current events with an emphasis on politics, legal issues, books, movies and whatever is on my mind. Emails can be sent to almostsanejoe@aol.com; please put "blog comments" in the subject line.
About Me
- Joe
- This blog is the work of an educated civilian, not of an expert in the fields discussed.
Sunday, July 12, 2026
Saturday, July 11, 2026
LGBTQ Films
Friday, July 10, 2026
SCOTUS Watch
Justices Amy Coney Barrett and Elena Kagan will appear July 14 before the House Appropriations Subcommittee on Financial Services and General Government, which has jurisdiction over the annual spending measure that funds the Supreme Court, according to a scheduling announcement from House Appropriations Chair Tom Cole (R-Okla.).
The Supreme Court might be in recess, but it is still in session. Odds and ends still occur.*
The most notable news, however, is that two justices will (for the first time since COVID) appear before Congress. Thomas, for some reason, stopped by recently. Not in an official capacity.
The usual procedure was to have a liberal and a conservative justice, as we have here. The appearance provides members to ask justices non-budget related questions.
“the right to have rights—to freely participate in our political community”
We will also have many term round-ups.
Prof. Dorf discusses a controversial reference in the birthright citizenship opinion. I don't think he quite salvages the reference. Yes, noncitizenship is "less secure." Noncitizens still have rights.
Prof. Segall talks about Kavanaugh's de facto acceptance of living constitutionalism. Brett has to bow down to the originalist god, including talking about how constitutional "meanings" hold firm.
As with the English language generally, however, meanings change over time, too. Sorry dude.
==
Note: The summer is sometimes so lacking in SCOTUS news that I am left to cite the website providing a typo correction to one of its opinions.
The Court used to fix typos silently as if there were editing elves doing so out of public view. Now, they openly cite even the smallest edits.
They also provide the final "bound" version of the opinion, which in the past took years but now starts during the term itself, including any changes at the bottom of the page.
Check out here. There are "revisions" with the date provided. You can also look down the page and see the first twenty or so opinions now have exact page locations.
The changes, like the different versions of biblical verses (h/t Bart Ehrman), are often trivial. Nonetheless, it is a good bit of open government.
ETA: Graham Platner finally formally removed himself from the Senate race. The new replacement of Senator "Kavanaugh Won't Overturn Roe!" will hopefully be picked later this month.
Wednesday, July 08, 2026
Doonesbury + Socialists
Saturday, July 04, 2026
Happy 4th
Thursday, July 02, 2026
Wednesday, July 01, 2026
SCOTUS Watch: Summer Recess
The shitty trans athletes opinion shows the importance of voluntary trans protections, including those in New York.
The summer recess begins. The justices will have to address some things that pop up. They also have scheduled stuff:
For your planning purposes, summer order lists are scheduled to be issued on Monday, July 20; Monday, August 17; and Friday, September 4, 2026. Summer order lists usually consist of actions taken by the Court on motions in pending cases, petitions for rehearing, and other miscellaneous matters. Emergency orders, such as in applications for stays, will continue to be released as required.
Fix the Court suggests justices should circuit ride. I think it would be a decent idea if they spent more time in the lower courts. One idea: have each circuit justice preside over en banc hearings.
The justices (minus two) might not be great at being district court judges. But I'm open to some thoughts.
We can spend the summer thinking about the Supreme Court. People think "court reform" means more justices. Let's think further. It's more than that.
ETA: A pending case on the shadow docket involved a stay for reporter Catherine Herridge, who faced a daily $800 fine for refusing to name her sources in a Privacy Act lawsuit.
Chris Geidner has the details. The facts go back at least to 2017, but now she has superlawyer Paul Clement on her side. No dice. Only Kavanaugh, without comment, would have granted the stay.
(The lower panel had judges from the Carter, Biden, and Trump administrations, nomination-wise.)
The final decision was handed down Thursday. It shows that we still will have some miscellaneous stuff popping up during the summer recess.
Once upon a time, the Supreme Court was officially out of session. If it wanted to hear something as a group, they had to make a special effort. Individual justices handled things in the meanwhile.
That is no longer the case. The individual justices still handle circuit matters. Nonetheless, the Court as a whole is still in session.

