Here's a
pro-Obama article, referencing his state legislative accomplishments, which ends on a fair note, underlining lack of coverage on the legislative records on all three of the top candidates. It is relevant, but it should be noted that these people aren't running for "legislative" office. Thus, their proposals should be taken with a grain of salt -- they
aren't running to be the head of parliamentarian governments, are they? BTW, here's one of those "one state, Edwards should go"
types that annoy me. And, a pro-Edwards
post as balance.
