Re-read this book, which I already discussed a few years back, and again found it rewarding. Got a bit tedious at certain points where it seemed she was rambling some. But, has some good insights, including basically a way to apply it for atheists (focus on "nature" over "nature's God"). Central argument was how the document promoted equality, including each person's equal role in the collective "people" involved here to govern (basic to human rights existing itself), determine wrongs that warranted change and so forth.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thanks for your .02!