F-bomb lady

A blog hit was connected to this picture of word goddess Kory Stamper.

"God"

Reading about Islam and Muslims, I again am left thinking that a lot of things are not about the actual concrete (so to speak) "God" of religion, but the concept and understandings behind that. The concepts and principles for which "God" is probably a sort of symbol, a personification that people find necessary to make real. When people sneer at "God" or "religion," or certain types, that should be their concern too.

Airplane!

The Airplane movies were on last night. Amazing how much stuff is rammed in there. The amount of stuff you can miss (especially on network broadcasts) alone. The white/red loading area bit with a kicker about abortion, e.g. The announcement of an Airplane III actually turns out to be based on reality. Surely.

"Sexual Assault and The Military: The Answer Goes Beyond What the Pentagon or Congress Propose"

This discussion looks at the "culture" that helps promote sexual abuse in the military (my own Sen. Gillibrand is a leading voice on this issue). I provide a partial dissent and would think that the shocked comment as to adult literature comes off as pretty silly. Still, sexual freedom being a good thing doesn't stop it from being a complicated thing, including protecting individual dignity in the process. After all, it often involves surrendering it!

Rev. Joe: No god but God: The Origins, Evolution, and Future of Islam

Reza Aslan has received some fame for his appearance on FOX promoting a new Jesus biography, and this effort suggests it will be worthwhile. A well written three hundred page "biography" of the religion covers the basics. Clearly not comprehensive, but a good progressive approach to the material. The Jesus book is on reserve.

Another NSA "Bombshell"

See here. I guess the "big story" needs a bit of context. See also comments by the likes of "WiscoJoe" here (not me). I'm wary about the whole thing, but find some of the "this is tyranny" stuff dubious. For instance, my comments here. And, by now, quite repetitive.

Not quite the same thing

IMHO: One provision of the PPACA v. suspension of habeas corpus.

Together We Cannot Fail

I enjoyed Terry Golway's book on Nathaniel Greene back in the day and see he has worked on a few books that provide audio of presidential speeches. This one concerns FDR with thirty short excerpts. Powerful stuff though the text gets a bit repetitive at times.

As if Dodgers needed more help ...

After defensive misplays led to 2-3 runs, ump miscalls (blatantly a 3-2 way outside "strike") blocked the Mets from making up for them. Worse, the manager not only didn't complain (it deserved getting tossed; even Vin Scully was a bit taken aback), but barely reacted. Almost worse.  West Coast, so this happened after midnight local time. Some way to end a day.

The Fosters

With the show now on hiatus, I am left with watching old episodes again. The one after Stef was shot is probably the best one and one sign (other than great flashbacks) are numerous great reaction shots. Some subpar efforts are worthy of a bit of respect for being pretty well put together. The good ones make you think "this is good." In more than one way.

Touch of Realism

The author of the cat book noted he [putting aside his basically dumpy guy look] was someone people would not notice on the street, in fact, if he was, some would not have a pleasant reaction. This adds to the power of the reality of the book, a bit more of an edge than say Marley & Me. If there is a movie, hopefully that edge will be retained.

Ginsburg on Opera and the Law

The speech page on the USSC website is mainly dominated by Stevens, but Ginsburg has a few entries, including a recent one with an opera focus. It ends with a few lines of a pending Ginsburg/Scalia opera. Yes, "opera star" is not in the cards for our fair justice.

A Street Cat Named Bob: And How He Saved My Life

This is a basic book -- a recovering British addict who makes a living busking (and then selling newspapers) gets inspiration to improve his life from a cat he found (or vice versa) -- and charming and powerful for that very reason. No great happenings, just a life.

Rev. Joe Book Review: The Quarryman's Bride

Found this at a cozy library during my recent trip to Staten Island, it originally from a branch much nearer to me. It's a Christian historical fiction about some family tragedy and redemption in 1890s Minnesota. A bit too heavy at times on the message (I'm game, up to a point, but tad much), but the story and writing is pleasant enough.

Working Girl

The author of the book just referenced was the source of the famous movie The Birds, which started out as a short story that was not about some classier than class eye candy.  Might have to read it some time. Was not really overly impressed by the movie -- it really requires you to be mesmerized by the lead, since much of the running time involves her without anything really bad going on.

No disrespect to Tippi Hendren, who is the mom of Melanie Griffith, herself one of those actress best known for a few roles (1988 was a good year, particularly given Working Girl; she had at least one jail-bait role in the 1970s) though she continues to work until the present.  It is nice when actors and actresses have long careers -- Mystic Pizza (1988) is an example. Multiple people there still have work, including each female (the male love interests and at least one supporting character have found work too) lead. It's helped by cable (or whatever) expanding greatly the number of roles. Annabeth Gish (distantly related to the silent screen stars), for instance, is in the new series The Bridge, which I sometimes saw previews for while watching something else (like The Fosters, maybe) on demand. 

Working Girl has some of this, including a bit even regarding the spin-off. Yes, though I don't recall it (liked the movie), there was a television version (see also, Baby Boom), if one that only lasted twelve episodes (less showed).  Melanie Griffith's part was played by ... a young Sandra Bullock!  I actually remember her being cut from Letterman once when she played a small supporting role in an early movie of hers. He later apologized, apparently seeing the charm she showed back then too.

The basic idea of a Staten Island girl done good -- assistant to junior exec -- is followed, but without the whole Harrison Ford deal (Trask appears to be the only real cross-over character ... the person who plays her boss in this version is another "I know her" character actor sort).  When Bullock's early work is referenced, it generally is some crappy Amazon themed film or maybe Love Potion No. 9. In fact, she had a few other roles, including some television work.  Ah trivia.  It's useful ... right?

Oh, the Sal Pascarella character sounds like the nudge from While You Were Sleeping, one of her first true "cute girl" successes.

---

* The intro provides a low rent view of the Staten Island ferry shots from the film, plus a subway turnstile, suggesting she is perhaps working midtown somewhere.  The ferry is currently free, which makes it a great little tourist stop. At some point, it was fifty cents, at least one way. Not bad either.  I'm pretty blase about NYC, lifer here, but felt a bit like a tourist myself here recently -- nice people watching too while waiting for the ferry to load. Mini-UN of sorts.  But, really. Free?!

Review Quickies

The final book of the writer of Rebecca is the atypical effort Rule Britannia, a political satire about the U.S. invading the U.K. and the rebellion led by an elderly former actress and her young charges. Quite readable with an interesting p.o.v. of her granddaughter, not totally gung ho about it all. Prime is a slight but well put together wry film about a woman dating a younger man who turns out to be her therapist's son. Leads do well. Interesting ending.

Law Man

Latest on the author in question. [More.]

Addicted to Prayer?

[And Also: I found this old post of mine about a book entitled Converting Kate. It uses one of my favorite examples, the God laughs at his creation besting him story.]

There is an interesting article entitled "Addicted to Prayer" in the NYT referencing "evidence accumulates about the many health benefits of religious practice."  The article compares prayer to role playing games: when "people use prayer to enhance their real-word selves, they feel good. When it disconnects them from the everyday, as it did for the student, they feel bad."

There are both positive and negative ways to pray. And, it is not necessary based on some actual existence of God, that is as some actual concrete being. The concept though ... which underlines the complexity of religion as a whole.  Some atheists or agnostics focus on the idea that "religion" is fantasy.  But, it is unclear if something that is the basis of human history from the beginnings apparently lingers on merely because people are convinced about things not there.  To quote the article, there is a human "capacity to make something real" here.

Meanwhile, the U.S. government submitting a brief that largely supports the N.Y. community involved in an upcoming USSC case involving use of legislative prayer to start government meetings.  This would overturn the ruling below, which a betting person would see likely (the best to hope for is a narrow ruling), which interpreted Marsh v. Chambers somewhat more strictly than the government here suggests is required.  This is more likely given changes on the Court that makes dicta* from a creche case for which wrote the main partial dissent likely to have less holding power.

The federal government says the lower court should not have analyzed the content of the prayers here.  I think the lower court makes sense in noting, including referencing other circuit rulings, that the content can be taken into consideration to some degree, even without "parsing" them. The lower court in effect uses a balancing approach to determine if endorsement, particularly the "effect" of it (to allude to the Lemon Test) is present.  This includes using only local clergy, implications the Christian dominated prayers were "our" prayers (not just the personal means of the people used to sanctify the proceedings) and did not do enough to guard against endorsement. I would let such a fact specific enterprise stand.

The analysis of the brief did note that the government is more supportive of the endorsement test. Changes in personnel matter here too. The 2CA cited, e.g., on a Ten Commandments case where Breyer was the determining vote. He in effect used a balancing test. O'Connor is no longer on the Court.  The four man plurality there has a fifth vote.

That broad assault by the town on the theory is not imitated in the government brief.  Indeed, there is a section of the government document which suggests that a government body that has not had prayers as a part of its historic practice perhaps should take steps “to clarify to a reasonable and informed observer” that it is adopting a prayer practice in keeping with the limited role of prayers in government settings.   The reference to the views of an observer suggests an element of caution about whether a newly adopted prayer practice might be seen as a form of endorsement of religion.

The brief's suggestion here is more advice than command though the lower court would probably see it more of the latter. "Before 1999, Town Board meetings began with a moment of silence." As noted here, in the past, changing gears here in the past might have been seen as a red flag. Policy-wise, which is not the issue here specifically true, the old policy would have been best. A moment of silence helps to avoid the problems that might arise here -- as seen there, the case in small localities can be harder for 1A purposes than a state legislature or the U.S. Congress.

As is, hopefully the opinion will be decided narrowly, and this fact specific dispute that in no way blocks legislative prayer will not be used to broadly dispose of the endorsement test.  Should we just trust the matter to local governments?  Protecting religious minorities would seem just the sort of Carolene Products justification of some court action here. But, realistically, especially with a narrow ruling, that will be the case largely either way.  Even when any controversy is a result of a gratuitous replacement of long practice that was better left be.

---

* Government practices, even legislative prayer, "that have the effect of affiliating the government with any one specific faith or belief" is illegitimate. Thus, a comment in Marsh regarding "indication that the prayer opportunity has been exploited to proselytize or advance any one, or to disparage any other, faith or belief" is given a somewhat stricter flavor. The government brief in effect hand wavers away the later dicta.

"When Younger Players Showed Way on Testing "

I have seen some discussions about how the steroid policy in baseball is a joke and "everyone" cheats anyhow. I find this annoying -- everyone doesn't cheat, the policy protects the health of players overall and the players agreed to the policy. It is actually being enforced now. Rightly so. Also, A-Rod is no victim. Enough of that b.s. The fact he's (annoyingly) still playing underlines due process, even in this context, is being followed.

The Fosters

First, Rizzoli & Isles was pretty good today with a surprise ending that left the mystery somewhat unsolved. Somewhat hit/miss with this show, but kudos when it's good. Also, the After Ellen recap is up and the "Joe Lies" (Say Anything) reference is you know film nerd porn. Mystic Pizza (same actress) also was on recently. Damn thing was on 25 years ago.

Arizona enacts ban on abortions based on gender, race

This week's RH Reality Check podcast flagged this law that targets physicians, not the girls/women, though they are burdened in the process. The law is offensive -- you have a choice to have an abortion, not only for the "right" reason. If the abortion is to cover-up an interracial affair, is that a problem? Anyway, you have a right to do things, even if for the "wrong" reasons. The law also inhibits free discussion with medical providers.

"Ruminating on Personhood in Today’s NY Times"

h/t to an interesting article. This is sound: a "right is a legally enforceable claim." This means (some) animals have certain rights, including protection from cruelty. If corporations can be a form of person, animals should too, especially since if anything a dog should often be more protected. Not sure if they will get 1A rights though.

One more thing ...

The tweets reminded me of something -- particularly in an earlier scene, the show rather well made it clear the two women just had sex and were currently nude under the coverages. Hints sometimes are best. Also, Teri Polo had some great acting moments. Finally, kudos dramatically for her dad -- everything didn't work out in the end. In real life, life is messy.

Save Money (Except for the Extras)

A sort of in-joke on The Fosters has Lena's dad become an Internet minister to be able to preside over the marriage ceremony, something done outside of t.v. shows too. He's played by the same person who played Rev. Camden on Seventh Heaven. BTW, he references a small price tag. Have no fear -- you can get it free via ULC Church!

Third Amendment and the Limits of Narrow Interpretation

And Also: An Onion article in honor of the (summer) season finale of The Fosters, the marriage episode. A problem with the court scene. And, don't really like the cliffhanger -- poor Jude will be crushed! I can accept it, but it still is pretty stupid on Callie's part to run away like that. Still, she is sixteen.

That military powers of the Commander in Chief were not to supersede representative government of internal affairs seems obvious from the Constitution and from elementary American history. Time out of mind, and even now, in many parts of the world, a military commander can seize private housing to shelter his troops. Not so, however, in the United States, for the Third Amendment says,

No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.

Justice Jackson in a separate opinion in Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer is one of the few citations of the Third Amendment found in the Supreme Court opinions. Griswold v. Connecticut provides it merely as part of a string cite of various protections of privacy found in the Bill or Rights. The dissents in Poe v. Ullman cite it along with the Fourth Amendment as part of the protection of "the privacy of the home," so it is not seen only a "guarantee of the preference for the civilian over the military," but also a privacy protection.

The only apparent ruling that truly relied on it in the federal appeals court is Engblom v. Carey, a ruling only about thirty years old, and the claim was so novel that qualified immunity applied. The opinion and the amendment came up when a more recent case that might have Third Amendment implications was addressed here. The post suggests that it should not be incorporated, that its reference to "soldiers" in fact only applies to the federal government. That is not the fundamental freedom that should be incorporated into the Fourteenth Amendment.

The matter was addressed in comments by me in particular, but this is a case where the limits of originalism pop up. The professor in question has focused on original understanding before, writing over fifty page papers that others dispute to determine what "seems" to be the meaning of such and such a thing. Come on.  [See also, this on the reach of federal equal protection, something a few smart alecks sometimes lash against, since contra to long-held precedent, doctrinal or textual niceties allegedly make federal substantive equal protection review moronic.]

I am not, you know, a scholar about these things, but after a couple decades, yeah, do sort of know some basics. At least, enough to know there are complexities and it is often a choice where to take things, especially pursuant to current understanding. The piece, e.g., argues that "troops" and "soldiers" implies a federal reach, since states don't have "troops." But, put aside that Art. 1, sec. 10 is not an absolute bar.  Why shouldn't "soldiers" here be interpreted broadly?  The Engblom opinion in fact doesn't do much heavy-lifting at all.  But, how about U.S. v. Miller?

The Militia which the States were expected to maintain and train is set in contrast with Troops which they [p179] were forbidden to keep without the consent of Congress. The sentiment of the time strongly disfavored standing armies; the common view was that adequate defense of country and laws could be secured through the Militia -- civilians primarily, soldiers on occasion.

The Third Amendment works applied to modern day police (which act more like soldiers did in that era) and state guard type troops. Why would even civilians serving a militia role have the ability to quarter in someone's home? The civilians are acting like "soldiers" on that occasion.  "Troops" is not the word used. If a case about the militia and Second Amendment can use the word "soldier," we can here too. What is the point of being so literal and specific?  Being forced to keep state agents in one's home probably can be seen in most cases at least as a sort of "seizure" of the home or a temporary "taking" or a violation of the privacy of the home protected by the substantive due process.

Or, we can honor the spirit of the Third Amendment.

Colibrí

I found this book about a kidnapped Guatemalan girl, and though it is written for a middle school audience (in the voice of the twelve year old protagonist), adults can appreciate it as well -- at times, it seems like she is narrating from when she is older, though it is written as if the events occurred recently on an ongoing basis (tense is sort of strange in fiction that way). Good book with a flavor of the place and culture. Bit scary for kids.

"How Not to Convince Republicans to Address Climate Change"

Prof. Adler a conservative/libertarian who supports the need to address climate changes criticizes a response by some old time Republicans (who he wonders should even be called that any more).  His support is appealing, makes him seem approachable, but his mind-set still is problematic. It is like his concern for blocking judicial nominees and refusing (even when one of his fellow bloggers used the word as I pointed out more than once) to use the word "filibuster" for some of the actions.

I responded myself,* including addressing an update. One thing I noted, e.g., are that the people in the op-ed are Republicans, replying to someone else that they had various leadership roles in the past.  Also, putting aside Adler's concern about the river matter (see below), the op-ed didn't only reference that.  The link above can be used to read my responses.  An update led me to respond again, which will be re-published here, since I think it might be the most important part of the discussion on my end:

"The Right" (I stereotype here a bit akin to suggesting the op-ed writers aren't really "Republicans") doesn't really appear to "believe climate change is a problem" that is worthy of much concern, that is, one that would require them to focus on as compared to other things, or even understand it is one of those things government power should be used to address, akin to abortion or use of executive power against national security threats. So, that's an uphill battle.

For instance, a carbon tax is suggested. But, the current Right in the House of Representatives are of one mind -- taxes are bad. This is one reason why any hope for a bill seems to require some sort of pork -- in reality, Republicans in the House still care about that sort of thing. So, realistically, though Prof. Adler would on principle find this distasteful, it very well might realistically be part of a bill, if I thought there was a real shot at any sort of legislation in that department. And, like the PPACA, the first step might be imperfect. But, like health care, climate is a long haul. You need an opening & it will be a decades long journey. Any legislation unless we change how the Congress works will particularly be imperfect.

Some have put forth a bit of hope, since there are some of a conservative mind-set who see climate change as a religious issue -- it is part of God's duty to us to take care over those things we have dominion over or some such thing. That would to me be one approach: find allies among the Right's base. It would be helpful, yes, to use the Right's usual buzz words. For instance, a nod to "statists" or some put-down of "Science" (you know, Al Gore types). As to "demands tangible results to actual problems," the op-ed actually addressed that, even if one of the examples might be a trope. That is, something more symbol on some level than fact. But, tropes are used and a successful argument for the "Right" is likely to include one or more too. So, whatever works there w/i reason. I'm being a bit cynical, but yes, while pushing for solutions, flag possible bad ways to do things. Say there needs to be something done, and don't you want the "right people" to do it? Do nothing, and you know who will do it!

But, ultimately, you have to convince the Right that there is an actual problem worthy of some sort of real government regulation. Some here simply don't think so. Once you think there is a real problem, let's say crime or education, there is room to compromise and work on solutions. So, maybe vouchers will be part of the government's answer. The thing to do, I guess, is find some sort of entry level. Again, some use religion. Another path would be to suggest it is a way to attract certain types of future voters. This has influenced some to think immigration reform is necessary. Some, as some on the left already are doing, suggest there are free market advantages to addressing climate change. etc.

[end] I have read up on climate change some but don't claim expertise on the matter or the best approaches to address it, either scientifically or as policy. So, it is useful to read about the whole thing and try to understand as much as one can. Those in the comments, perhaps a tad overly cynical, suggesting "the Right" (apparently "Republicans" might not be members of it) are not really listening have a point. The concern that you have to speak about it to them in the right way is correct. But, it is not as much as talking about "statists" or something. It is ultimately about convincing Republicans that there is a reason, pragmatic or otherwise, to do something in the first place.  And, the result will be imperfect.

Prof. Adler, however, continually taking selective potshots at PPACA, including how it was passed without a planned conference effort to iron out difficulties, makes me doubt his awareness of the big picture. The posts never really address the reason why Congress acted as it did there. The Republicans, with the unfortunate addition of Scott Brown, blocked any ability to pass a new amended bill! And, he here takes a potshot at one of the op-ed writers for opposing Scott Brown in lieu of Elizabeth Warren.  Why are old-time Republicans supporting such people?

Adler is ideologically opposed to PPACA, but here is more sympathetic to the ultimate cause. Fine. But, the big picture is on some level the same.  The procedural and ideological roadblocks of the Republicans (and others, to be fair and complete), not merely arguing the case the wrong way, must be addressed.

---

* A shorter response in the comments addressed someone who (assuring us that s/he accepts the mainstream position that climate change is happening) thinks there is so much "political capital" invested in defending it that if evidence arises the other way (mind you s/he doesn't think there is), the scientists will not accept it.

The concern is ironic, since without partial blinders, it doesn't make much sense. The scientists already put their work on display, skeptics and others who or whatever reason support them (see also, tobacco companies) will be there and there surely won't ALL not honestly and ethically examine new evidence on global warning.

It also was pointed out the attacks are seen as attacks on science itself. This is true on some level -- it arises in any number of contexts and has some degree of merit in many of them -- but overall, you have to rely on the things noted to be safeguards. Only something of a conspiracy theory approach really works here unless there (not present here) is some reason to fear significant information is blocked or hidden by some small group.

Pioneering civil rights attorney Julius Chambers dies

A civil rights hero, who lived the history and fought to point it in the right direction. He was from North Carolina and worried about new restrictive voting laws. The fight continues and his style -- quiet, smart, powerful -- is an important means to address it.

Mets v. KC etc.

Mets split two trudges vs. the KC Royals thus far -- you know, their usual rivals. In both games, KC pitchers got a hit, one key to a three run inning. Chen did pitch in the NL, but still. The relievers got 18 of 19 out today. The one the winning run in the 12th. Oh well. Meanwhile, can A-Rod go away? Some, apparently seriously, say he is being mistreated by MLB. Sorry, not buying it. MLB aren't saints, but of the two ...

August Doldrums

So goes the Mets. Their closer's neck hurts and he has been out for a few days. Their All Star 3B got hurt racing for first, hurting his achy hammy, the throw airmailed anyhow. Led to their young newbie starter, Zack Wheeler pinch running. It was bound to happen eventually with the team struggling for runs, every base counting, but the immediate cause was a blown save by their fill-in closer. Another reliever is out for the year, probably.

Criminal Justice Quickies

Another article about states running low on execution drugs. I think some solution will be found for Texas at least. Others states might let it go; Texas likes executing people too much to not manage a means to get in their quota. "federalist" here really lets go against the California prison order. Such venom is a wonder to behold. Have been a victim of it, but apparently, down to an octogenarian Supreme Court journalist, I'm in good company.

Supreme Court Watch

Couple notable orders, prisons and adoption.

Imperfection is a feature, not a bug

Were the drivers involved in these cases, to one degree or another, knuckleheads? Absolutely. (I include myself.) However, the world is full of knuckleheads, and if fixing mistaken directions can save them from themselves, it seems incumbent on the navigation companies to fix them.

Exactly. Any system has to take into consideration humans are human, including per a recent debate I had, the idea that the pope can be totally infallible about anything.

In the Family

Birth, genetics, who looks like or acts like whom doesn't matter. A family is a group of individuals who love, hate, trust, question, need, console, and depend on one another as they grow and mature and learn how to give a little more, take a little less ... all in the same environment, whatever or wherever it may be.

-- "The Lives Behind The Lines ..." [Lynn Johnson]

The ABC Family show The Fosters, as does the network as a whole in a fashion (Gilmore Girls was an earlier show a "family friendly" group, usually a code word for conservative, supported*), suggests the breadth of the term "family." It involves a lesbian couple with the biological son of one, two twins they adopted and the two foster kids they recently took in. The drama includes the father of the teenage son and recently his grandfather.  It is rightly getting kudos as a gem of the season.

The title film is basically about something a 1970s Supreme Court ruling about an extended family reminded us not to do -- "close our eyes to the basic reasons why certain rights associated with the family have been accorded shelter."  It was suggested to me by a reader some time back, but it has recently been available on DVD (had a short run locally, but missed it), so checked it out.  First time the DVD did not only have two discs (extras basically discussing the style of the film and its creation) but an oversized pamphlet that didn't fit in the case of essays by others. 

Very good film, the talent underlined by the fact the star ("Joey," which has a backstory to it) also wrote and directed.  It is amazing what goes into even the crappiest film out there, so a 169 minute effort like this is on another level even without it being so good. I admit to not watching it straight thru -- short attention span with the Internet and all -- but was never bored or anything. The film has a set pace, in effect as low key (if "low key" had a picture next to it, this guy would show up) as the main character. Little music and no montages that I can recall -- we get a feel of the characters raising from watching them have breakfast [the very title of another film on a related subject] and similar things.  Lot of quiet empathy.

The film not only underlines the complexity of family (the lead himself was the product of a foster home, he adopted the name of the person who became his dad), but of sexuality. The lead is a contractor of sorts and met his partner while working on the house of his and his wife (pregnant at the time). The wife dies and he is there to help the guy thru his pain and somehow something happens and they become a couple.  It occurs the other way too, of course -- a person running for mayor of NYC (you know, other than the jerk) is married to someone who at the time considered herself a lesbian.  Sexuality is not black/white, fitting here too since this is also an interracial romance -- Asian and white -- in Tennessee yet.

The sense of place (strangely, the credits has it being filmed in NY! did I read that right?!)  is important to the film, since it adds flavor to the process. An Asian with a Southern accent? Who knew such a thing occurred?  The film takes place in the early 2000s, so you think he would not have as hard of a time finding a lawyer after the aunt takes their son away (his partner died in a car crash, but never re-wrote his will, since people don't expect to die in car crashes). I would note that the scene felt like it might have been a mistake -- the way it happens makes her look like a total, I'll be crude, bitch. We don't see it, but it must have been very traumatic for the six year old son.  There was other ways to go that would still be pretty bad without a glorified form of kidnapping. You can understand why it was done that way, but it felt off when it occurred, dramatically so.  I guess there is more than one way to read the situation.

Anyway, check out the film to see a powerful (and heartbreaking at times) story and act of film-making. The top link can get you some background.  Lots to like, including his comment, amazed, that anyone would doubt he was the kid's dad. The supporting cast, mainly (I recognized one person in a small role) non-big names, were also excellent, especially the person playing the young son.  The guy who eventually becomes his lawyer also has a plum role and some plum dialogue. I can see the person who recommended this film saying something like he did. Thanks for the heads up.  Oh, since I know a couple, the scene in the classroom is great too.

ETA: The lawyer's little speech to Joey is a key moment in the film and an excerpt is even used in the trailer. The scene is excellent for various reasons, including how Joey is shot with a focus on the expression on Joey's face as he listens. It is a highlight of movie-making.

---

* The show had some conservative aspects, which on some level should not surprise, since it is about a teen that not only had her baby, but who became a major success story through hard work and continued to pine for the father of the child.  I liked the story a lot in its early years, but in time, did feel it cheated the audience. And, the slut shaming of Paris really rankled. The character also became something of a caricature though overall that happened to others as well, including at times the leads.

Ariel Castro

Some people lack a certain amount of humanity, including those some might call "monsters," particularly sociopaths. Some seem poster children for the death penalty, but it won't only apply to the "no doubt cases." And, including when there is no death, there is a basic moral [comment] and legal rule. One even those whose life is to protect children have supported. Dissent is apparent and understandable. Glad he pled and we avoided the specter of a trial.

Rizzoli & Isles

AfterEllen loves this show for its lesbian subtext and TV Tropes notes various things about it can let people look past the writing. Yes. TNT is filled with mystery shows mostly about characters ("characters welcome" doesn't only apply to USA), just too much to expect the scripts to be consistently good. Monday's episode was though, the mystery's wrap-up still a bit lame. Surrounding parts done well, Rizzoli a bit less annoying than usual.

The Girl

A good film concerning a desperate young Texan mother who loses her child to foster care and tries smuggling Mexicans across the border, but it goes tragically wrong, and she has to deal with a young girl who lost her mother. "Making of" segment narrated by director. From the producers of the also very good Maria Full of Grace. Abbie Cornish (an Australian actress sounding quite Texan, speaking Spanish too) is excellent in the lead.

“Teaching Controversial Topics”

This short paper by a guest blogger at Concurring Opinions is an interesting read with various applications. Certain topics do have to be carefully discussed and "outliers" can be a problem, especially in the educational context. It is amazing how social expectations are so important in some cases. Note sometimes the "outliers" aren't necessary wrong.

Trade Deadline

Pretty dead really with few trades overall, so it is far from shocking or concerning that the Mets did not find anything worth giving up Byrd, Parnell or anyone else for. Closers aren't a dime a dozen anyway and Byrd (a bargain) helps team compete and youngsters develop now. Meanwhile, Lagares has great "d" and showing some "o" at CF. Nice surprise.

"Openly Gay Justice Nominee Goes Off Script to Thank Partner, Kids"

A bit old news, but it was re-aired on C-SPAN today. Also, with filibuster battles and all, let me note that I would seriously consider a great reduction on necessary up/down votes when dealing with assistant positions like this. OTOH, if truly an "officer," it is constitutionally necessary. So, stopping filibusters here is particularly important.

Bradley Manning

The "aid the enemy charge" was overreaching as probably is discretion-wise some of the other charges. The charges he pled guilty for provides enough chance to punish him along with what already occurred. It's gratuitous. His treatment was probably wrong there, if not as horrible as some say. What he did is rightly seen as criminal on some level.

The Fosters

Stef was shot, but is okay, and it brought forth flashbacks and a marriage proposal. Very good episode. There is, of course, a little wrinkle on the shooting to cause some drama.

PSA: Donate Blood ... It's Easy & Rewarding (with free snacks!)

"Let the Supreme Court Handle Appointments to the FISA Courts"

One little known tidbit is the role of the Chief Justice in staffing FISA courts and this suggestion that this is constitutionally (and otherwise) problematic is convincing. The Chief Justice is not akin to a President and here doesn't even have the advice/consent check. The solution in this case is open to debate; Senate confirmation might be best.

Disney "Flash Forward" Theme

A few Disney shows last night "flashed forward" in various ways to show the future of some characters. Not the first time they had a [yup!] united theme like this and like before mixed bag. Cute actress for teenage Charlie; the episode was okay. Shake It Up might have been the best. Still not liking Debby Ryan's new show.

Weekend Break

First, a quick cite to a 3CA ruling that rightly realizes for profits are different in respect to religious liberty than individuals. Even if you don't draw the line the exact same way, the result is sound. I just worry the USSC won't treat the contraceptive mandate quite so sanely.

Smashed

This was one of those films on my DVD list and found it on demand. It's about a young teacher who handles her alcoholism. The lead is very good and the film overall is decent, but seems a bit underdeveloped. Megan Mullally has a play against type supporting role and looks uncomfortable though that also is the nature of the character. Worth a look.

"Self-Defense" Laws

I think the Zimmerman verdict is probably correct and even your garden variety leftie have felt bad hinting otherwise. Still, not only should we not go the other direction (e.g., assume Martin is guilty), but it does raise serious questions, including on line drawing for use of lethal force. Then, there is someone who feels a car is worth more than a thief's life.

Weiner

Key problem here is that unlike say President Clinton, his record overall isn't that impressive. What did he really do? So, personal issues and respect [Julia Sweeney, e.g., was on Twitter in effect saying he comes off as a jerk.] is that much more important. Other than name recognition, not really sure why I should support him for mayor over a City Council President or other possibilities. At least, Spitzer (running for comptroller) was AG/governor.

Huh ...

Rosanna also has two brothers and two sisters (used to be three brothers and one sister) in show business.

Explanation. Just saw Tim Hudson get hurt in a freak injury in the 8th in the midst of him cruising during a 6-0 Mets game. [Suffered a right ankle fracture when] he didn't step out of the way covering first base. Don't recall seeing something quite like that during a game.

The Fosters

I'm up to date now, watching the latest episode, which was somewhat slow going until a violent cliffhanger. But, even here, the actors played their parts well, which is a telling sign of something good. The show's [Recaps here.] habit of ending while something is ongoing is a nice touch that usually works well. I know you: you are from Crazy Like A Fox!

Selling Caskets Not Quite Akin To Personal Traits

Some monks won a lawsuit involving a policy "granting funeral homes an exclusive right to sell caskets" and the state is asking the USSC to take up the case. The first link included various types supportive of the ruling, but I disagreed there (and here) -- in fact, it might lessen regulation, since various things encourage funeral homes to act properly here vis-a-vis anyone out there being able to sell caskets. Rational for 14A purposes.

Ohio Officials Ordered To Recognize Gay Couple’s Marriage

The matter has been dealt with here, especially in comments, but to summarize: states that selectively target same sex couples in ways not done for minors or first cousins are pretty easy 14A calls. Windsor dealt with the feds, but equal protection is a general concern. These rather sympathetic cases are the ladder pegs to full SSM recognition.

Mixed DC Circuit ruling in suit against FDA allowing execution drug importation

Big questions generally have a lot of small ones that can affect them -- look at the Prop 8 litigation and standing. So too the death penalty, discretion of the FDA to allow importation of drugs an example, given shortages. I think ultimately a way will be found around this, especially given there being no overall shortage of production of lethal items.

Supreme Court Watch

The Supreme Court scheduled three days to release orders over the summer and today was the first -- nothing seems notable. No, I'm not "Joe Doe." Death penalty orders continue as necessary and/or and special situations. John Paul Stevens also commented on Shelby. Now that Helen Thomas (RIP) has died, he has to up the "over 90" commentator role.

PS

The recent episodes were on demand, but found the first on YouTube, not the second. The DVD I just watched had a PSA against against pirating, including downloading indie films. I understand that, but question how far to take it, especially with television shows like this. Know about copyrights. Full low budget films and stuff sold for profit are pretty easy calls. Targeting kids for music downloads? Not so much. Still annoyed with all those false hits.

The Fosters Cover All The Bases

Catching up some more on The Fosters, issues covered include the morning after pill (including id problems), transgender kids, religious beliefs (a Catholic couple supported SSM, but slipped up -- contraceptives is the example to point to regarding dissent from doctrine; otoh, their teenage daughter was there) and biracial families. Checklist anyone?

Nice Girl Plays Bad

Maia Mitchell's new Disney movie reflects my image of her -- cheery girl. So, bad language alert, when her character in the series premiere of The Fosters not only was beaten up in juvie but notes the lead couple are "dykes" and references the "real" (not adopted) kid, it was just downright amusing. Sort of seeing Debby Ryan as a drug addict on Private Practice.

Letters from Skye

This is a poetic epistolary novel -- like an 18th Century creation, it is made up of letters. It involves a love affair surrounding WWI that affects things two decades later in WWII. Overall, I enjoyed it, but did not like an important plot point. Didn't ring true. But, very good first novel as a whole. Good sense of inner life, mystery, love and adventure.

Bloomington

I stop at a library weekends while checking some cats and stuff and often find a good DVD. Barely made it today, but was rewarded with this above average indie about celebrity, college student/teacher romance (with a bit of a twist) and more. Well done all around. One of the leads sorta seems familiar, but a check makes me think it's someone else I thought of.

ABC Family Continues Its "Different Kind of Family" Motif

Only know MM from promos on Disney, so surprised about her role in this more serious ABC Family with some other familiar faces. Saw two episodes so far and it's pretty good. 

"How Stand Your Ground Relates To George Zimmerman"

I dislike absolute language, especially when it clouds the situation, and suggestions that SYG had "nothing" to do with the verdict is an example. [I should read that guy more.] Sen. Durbin's scheduled hearing is a good move. Gun ownership requires due care, reasonable regulations and balanced self-defense rules. SYG rules skewer things.

Dick (No Not That)

An amusing and smart satire ("you have been talking for 18 1/2 minutes!") about two teenage girls that get caught up in Watergate with a slew of familiar faces, including a young (1999) Ryan Reynolds. It loses a bit after awhile, as these things tend to do, but overall fun. There is a commentary track, but the overly sedate tone put me to sleep.

Elizabeth McGovern

Delaying the Employment Mandate

I do not find this "blatantly unconstitutional" or horrible, especially given the reality of the situation. Given some accounts, this is a good voice of sanity.

A couple things ...

An interesting angle -- discussion of the federal Community Relation Service's role in the recent Florida drama. The conservative/libertarian blog Volokh Conspiracy has had some good kumbaya posts on how slavery isn't libertarian. Note to neo-confederates. A bit of snark, but appreciated; still, with the Shelby ruling etc., let's remember the Civil War also led to expansion of federal power and other changes where agreement is less prevalent.

All Star Game

And Also: Got to say that Colbert has been a bit rough the first two times back, with two extended 'eh' segments.  The Fox News bit last night was amusing.  Syndicated t.v. watch -- great episode of Rules of Engagement at midnight (my time) on WGN, Timmy going to the psychiatrist to help Russell find out about himself and Jeff upset about someone eating off his plate. Jen also had a good bit involving a stripped shirt.  


Mets fans very well might see the team going thru five year cycles, more or less, with the 2000 World Series long gone.  Many, especially since we are reminded of it every time the guy pitches when the Cardinals come to town, might recall 2006.  Then, there were the two years of the season ending on the final day (cf. 1999, where the team needed an extra game to get to the playoffs).  And, a bunch of downer years where hope for the playoffs disappeared, though first halves had a tendency to be okay.

The team appears to be going in the right direction now, costly contracts finally coming  off the ledger, no really stupid moves made (a few expensive relievers were signed last year, but relatively speaking, not akin to money tossed down the whole for the likes of Bay or Perez or Castillo).  Likewise, each year appears to have some highlight. First, though he ended on a wimp move (leaving game after an at bat), Reyes ended his Mets reign with a batting title. Then, a two-fer -- first no-hitter and a Cy Young winner (not even the same person!).

And, now an All Star Game and young phenom coming into his own -- Matt Harvey, who started it at his home park.  The first pitch was made (after some stretching) by Tom Seaver, who had a health scare recently, and later had a nice little interview.  Harvey might have had a bit of nerves, giving up a hit and hitting a batter, but then settling down for a good two innings of work.  There were only three hits by the NL (mostly boring game), two by Mets (one former -- Beltran -- one by Wright), the third by Paul Goldschmidt, Votto's replacement.  Note more than one local whined about Harvey skipping a start for an "exhibition game," as if it mattered he skipped and game. A co-host of a local sports show today noted that the game was probably the second most important start of his life thus far.  Yeah.  So, yeah, skipping a game vs. the Pirates didn't matter.

As noted, the game as a whole was pretty boring, the pitchers not giving much up at all after Harvey's starting hiccups.  A few moments, including Rivera's 8th inning appearance (remember, he started as a set-up man), are notable.  One pretty impressive was -- after chubby (Fielder) chugged a lead-off triple -- Grilli holding the AL scoreless in the 9th.  Kimbrel btw had the weakest inning -- three hits, one run. Lee didn't have a good inning either. The AL pitching was impressive. A great play by the third baseman (I believe Machado).  Rivera, the sentimental choice, was MVP, but winning pitcher Sale (two innings, no hits) might have earned it.

The Mets or NY fan was more interested in the start and finish, Harvey giving you two and Rivera giving a finale.  AL gets home field advantage.

Cutting The Mustard

I have overall enjoyed (found her latest a bit weak) books by the author of this examination of an employment dispute at BU, which in a two hundred page tight package told a personal story of personal conflicts while mixing in basic affirmative action theory and legal goings on.  Written in the mid-1980s, it is still quite relevant, especially as a defense of AA. An important catalyst in the (mixed blessing) story recently died.

‘Stand Your Ground’ Laws Expanding Protection for the Aggressor

Worthwhile read.

Free Quran

A recent hit to my blog went to a discussion to "religion," so it was apropos that my free Quran came today. Yes. I have never read the book, though have read books and took a couple classes that dealt with it and the religion as a whole. So, it was useful to find a website that provided free Qurans to converts/non-believers. The translation has received bona fides and it's a nice pocket sized version with helpful footnotes.

"Nuclear Option Averted"

Who really thought the "nuclear" option would actually be used? At best, mildly enthused here though let's see who the two replacements are. The abuse of the confirmation process opened up a possibility for real change. Mild win, but Rs already got a lot. See links for more.

"What Happens When We Actually Catch Edward Snowden?"

An interesting analysis.

Downton Abbey: S2

I have seen all but the Christmas episode and found it a good watch. Got your soap opera, WWI drama and comfort food (overall these are nice people). A few interesting extras. [Saw the final part ... a key thing finally happened after like eight years. If nothing else, characters here have a lot of patience. Colbert had an amusing parody.]

Rev. Joe: Complexity and Informed Knowledge Regarding Sexual Matters

This thread involves various attempts by myself and someone else (who I don't agree with exactly: an early abortion is not always, e.g., a "tragedy" imho) to explain the complexity of the abortion/adoption issue on moral grounds. The need to understand seems "bizarre" to some people, the overall tone and approach to me counterproductive. I find it sad.

What's On? Oh ... Zimmerman verdict

Especially with Florida law, I early on (before the trial and concerns about how the prosecution handled it) thought it possible that Zimmerman would be declared not guilty. Deep down, yeah, sorta think he's guilty, but being found so in Florida court is a bit different. It's a horrible case and hopefully something good will come of it. Ultimately, it is one case, if a recent archetype of various things. AMC had a Death Wish marathon on.

ETA: See, Richard here. I think that's quite possibly true.

Matt Harvey Drama

Reportedly, the Mets phenomenon and All Star (played at his home park this year) had blister issues and anyways the plan is to limit his innings. So, the management is skipping a start vs. the struggling/still leading Pirates. BIG DEAL. Everyone know the Mets aren't playoff bound. And, yeah, it's a big deal to have him nice and ready for the ASG, hopefully to start. At Citifield. The "message" sent is just that. No major disrespect to baseball purity.

Spitzer Gets Signatures for Comptroller Race

See my comment here and the matching article. More here. Spitzer is a schmuck. The main competition looks like an experienced pol well qualified, not doing it as some sort of personal crusade. I'm also not a big supporter of Weiner for mayor. He didn't do much last time and really doesn't appear to amount to much more now. He has name recognition.

Need a Lot? Get Rid of A Key Thing You Have!

There has been some talk about trading Mets' closer Bobby "the beard" Parnell, but not really sold. The Mets need many things. They have struggled with closers for years. But, one thing they seem to have is a young cheap one under their control. Let's trade him! For you know, a maybe. And, then we will have to find a closer again. Eh. Better wow us.

True Concern for Women's Health Is Good Public Policy

An article in the NYT and this discussion underlines that regulation of abortion providers is a real concern, but the selective anti-choice path of some who use Kermit Gosnell in a troll-like way (see, e.g., various posts at Mirror of Justice, to which I responded repeatedly with some spleen) is not the answer. Neutral medical regulation, not bigger game, is best.

"Senate Republicans Ratchet Up Fight to Block Obama Nominees to D.C. Circuit"

This sort of blatant partisanship makes the current breed of Rs distasteful to me.

The Note (I & III)

I liked The Note, a Hallmark film that ultimately relies on how much you like the two leads. I did and think they add to a mature superior drama. The third film is a bit watered down, but including a good performance of the struggling young mom to add a bit of realism, it is not bad. Basically a hour worth of good material in a ninety minute time though. Music a bit eh.

Pennsylvania Marriage Equality Case

The latest federal lawsuit raises the now quite familiar arguments (gender equality is included) and personal stories. The state appears to be one of the remainder without a constitutional amendment bar as such though legislative repeal seems unlikely. Unlike some, no fairly equal [possible limited win?] civil union option like NJ, if likely friendly in other ways. An outlier in the SSM friendly NE. Think a state amendment might be a better case. ETA: AG won't defend, but governor etc. still can.

Ramadan

Began yesterday. The most sacred month of Muslim calendar.

Camera in the Courtroom

I support the cause, especially the bipartisan nature, but might be biting too much to chew. How about starting with decision days or some such? What is the problem there? Or, a suggestion or requirement to test it out for a few cases?

PS

Well, last episode had dark. Almost gratuitously so.

Downtown Abbey

I am up to the final episode of the first series & the second is on its way. The third will take a bit of time, but in time for the fourth early next year. Can see why it is so popular. It's comfort food -- nothing really bad happened yet -- cushions some blows. Might do with more bite. Believe S2 will. Fan of Elizabeth McGovern in the past and nice she has a plum role here. She's around fifty and looks good -- good to have some maturity.

"When Leon Trotsky Agreed to Testify before the House Un-American Activities Committee"

Interesting historical trivia, including an expansive comment. Meanwhile, the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops supports voting reform, showing it doesn't just corrupt its brand via backward sex stuff. Really, keep with the stuff that matters people.

New Book Panel

I'm having problems finding a book that will "stick" the last week or so, but did find some good ones in recent months, a few found on the updated side panel. As expected, The Other Typist is being made into a movie. Keira Knightley will star. A few choice roles to fill.

Gettysburg: The Love Letter

A twist on celebrating the 150th anniversary of the battle -- an old Hallmark romantic fantasy about a miraculous correspondence through time with the battle as an important plot point. Jennifer Jason Leigh particularly adds some dramatic weight. Meanwhile, I'm late to the party, but liking Downtown Abbey so far. Hey, Elizabeth McGovern!

One out of Two Not Bad

I enjoyed The Riddle of the Labyrinth, a book about the deciphering of an ancient script, but found the author's first book (Talking Hands: What Sign Language Reveals About the Mind) much more of a trudge. The travelogue of sorts of a deaf friendly Arabic town was okay, if a tad repetitive, but the language discussion seemed more geared for specialists.

Rev. Joe: Mere Assertions

I liked Shadowlands, but only saw a bit of the Narnia films (didn't read them). Not impressed with this work. Not a fan of weak argument that draws webs from poor foundations. The stuff about marriage etc. also seems more than "mere" Christianity. [Agreed: even for a believer, this could be a trudge.] More criticism. [A few good bits, easy to read, but "cotton candy." At some point, bad argument is hard to read.] Might work for the choir.

Beating A Dead Horse: Selective ACA Concern

Distasteful metaphor but so it goes -- yet again, tried to get the contributors to face up to the selective nature of concerns about the contraceptive mandate. Hard not to just be snide, especially when petty potshots about Obama poll numbers are blithely ignored. Yeah, quite right you only addressed part of what I said. Such is the bloody problem.

Residential Tourist

For the holiday yesterday, I took a trip downtown to the Staten Island ferry (free), and staid down there long enough to see the beautiful sight of the harbor at night. A nice trip, including seeing some rental bikes, the East Coast Memorial, some nice on the eyes concert folks and so on. Few fireworks seen though. The bows that lit up were particularly cute.

Gettysburg (and Vicksburg too)

First off, can do without this heat. Anyways, as shown repeatedly on C-SPAN weekend, we are in the midst of the 150th anniversary of the Gettysburg battle and the fall of Vicksburg, part of the fight against slavery (the "but for" cause -- h/t a comment at the link -- of the Civil War). And, some on Seneca Falls, which is not totally unrelated. And, Happy 4th!

"Implementing Health Reform: A One-Year Employer Mandate Delay"

The difficulty of keeping all the balls in the air regarding an imperfect piece of legislation in the face of a recalcitrant House would cause problem for the best of Administration. Can't really fully judge but discussions like this lead me to be okay with the delay, even if it might be not a great move. Discretion here is not shockingly unprecedented either.

"Physician Participation in Executions"

This is a good article regarding the problems of strict principle here -- if executions will continue and error that can harm the person can be reduced, it seems ironic to refuse any participation even if the inmate asks for it. The other side has a point too.

"A Restroom of One’s Own"

Transsexuals are among those hurt by barriers to same sex marriage, but raise various tricky issues overall. I again recommend a couple books by Cris Beam on such issues.

Anthony Kennedy Does Ted One Better

Jonathan Rauch had a good commentary over the weekend on Kennedy's Windsor opinion and his skill at being at the median of things, though being labeled as a "politician" might suggest why others don't like him.  Here, at least, I think his opinion was very good, especially it highlighting the feds traditionally letting states develop marriage. The feds suddenly blocking the way is a special problem, even if SSM as a whole should be protected.

"Hobby Lobby Wins Before En Banc Tenth Circuit"

I find the idea that the contraceptive mandate is a thread to religious liberty absurd and find the whole thing aggravating, including the plain hypocrisy (and stupidity) of the Catholic Church focusing on this.  The same f-ing church -- yes, at some point it pisses me off -- that ignores that its own members are breaking the marriage sacrament in their eyes.  I simply don't understand how they can blithely let people who do this take communion. Or, do all those Catholics have two or so children because of the rhythm method?  For-profits seeking an exemption is truly stupid:

So the legal requirement that the plaintiffs pay for a health care plan which, among *many* other things, covers contraceptive services which may or may not *actually* be abortifacients, and which will neither be used by the plaintiffs nor given directly by them to employees who may choose to use them, is a violation of plaintiffs' religious principles.

How does this possibly rise to the level of "religious exemption"? I have to agree with Joe_JP that this is a tenuous argument at best for organizations whose primary purpose is actually religious, and utterly absurd for a commercial establishment (even one that's selling religious paraphernalia, and Hobby Lobby at least doesn't even have that excuse).

A post from "Scott" in this thread with various (same old) arguments from similar minds, including myself.  What really annoys me is that people like Prof. Adler refuse to explain how broad these claims are. They simply are not applicable to contraception though stretching the "abortion exception" (which is a policy exception, not a constitutional one) to include morning after pills is bad enough. If this is a problem, birth control pills overall and IUDs (maybe more) also might act this way.  No, it would apply to any single religious problem an employer, even a for-profit selling hobby supplies, might have with any health choice. Trying to drown us in minutiae won't change this. 

I find the concern of various religious affiliated schools (including those like various local ones that many might not deem "religious," like Manhattan College) dubious -- janitors should get to use their health care as they see fit.  But, when corporate for-profit hobby stores raise claims, it is nonsense on stilts.  So were claims against PPACA.  Yeah. I stick to my comment over there -- taking things this far really waters down the religious liberty and exemption brand.  It truly harms both overall.

The Chaos

This book uses West Indies myths and a good amount of surrealism (things just suddenly go crazy) to deal with a mixed raced teenage girl's self-discovery.  She is sassy, talented and comfortable with her sexual power, but troubled too.  I liked this as a whole but thought it rambled on too much about the surreal things going on. Could have been shorter.